12/30/2023 0 Comments Working for spyware terminatorWhile it could be possible to use different ips, names, address or phone we simply didn't do that. Regarding Crawler versus Ibis relation - this was covered on several places and our approach from day one was simple - we didn't try to hide the relation. And no, we don't employ professional blogers. All comments (which were not clearly labeled as related to our company) were posted by real users. We have internal policy prohibiting our team members to comment on our products without clear disclosure of their participation. I responded over there - but now I feel that it may be better to respond also on this forum.įirst of all let me comment on some facts which are not correct - PaulBB wrote that we have fake fans and we posted false reviews - all I can say is that this is not true. One of our users posted link to this discussion on our forums. Hi, first of all I want to make clear that I'm part of the development team of Spyware Terminator. ![]() But it would technically all be within the EUA/Privacy Policy of all the sites. The paranoia side of me thinks that, for instance, if crawler shared personally identifiable information with Xacti and Xacti had no policy of what it did with that information (being that PII is not defined by them) then there is no telling who eventually ends up with the information. The weird part is that "Personally Identifiable Information", "Cookies", and "Advanced Site Rank Feature" have had their definitions left out. The categories are : Information Collection, Personally Identifiable Information, Cookies, Sharing of Information, Advance Site Rank Feature, Policy Changes Making Changes, Contact Information. Certainly, if crawler, websearch, Ibis and Spyware Terminator are all owned by the Xacti it presents an issue of what is considered "outside."Īnd FWIW- if you go to the Xacti web site there is a privacy policy they have published. So besides the definition of "spyware" there needs to be defined what it means if a company says it will not share personally identifiable information outside its business. From there a person is directed to the same place websearch or crawler sends people. Go to and there are spyware terminator, free screensavers and games. They are all supposedly under the umbrella of. I have my suspicions when there is supposed to be a "distancing" of Crawler from Ibis or websearch when they are so interrelated that they share the same contact numbers as well as sharing the same product offerrings by sending users to the same site in order to download free products. But all we know for sure is what is provided to us, that being the EUA/Privacy Policy and I think there may be some semantics being played by Crawler specifically stating what they consider to be personally identifiable information as defined by them.Īnd if you go to check out the free screensavers of either or you are directed to another site,. Especially when the two have the same contact information. There has to be a certain amount of "guilt by association" involved here. But that is not based on any information I have available. Then, I suppose, IBIS could do with that info however they felt. Also, considering Crawler may not consider IBIS a 3rd party site, there may be other information exchanged between the two. ![]() But their EUA/Privacy Policy of crawler states they obtain user information (which I assume they sell to 3rd party sites). There are quite a few experienced and knowledgeable users, some hangers on, and a few wannabes.Click to expand.Well I suppose that depends on the definition of "spyware." That would be a starting point. Be advised that if you activate the HIPS feature, you'll need to learn how to answer popups about the innermost workings of Windows. But IMO it's not necessary, and I don't recommend it (the integrated AV, that is.) ![]() I've used the Clam in the past, didn't conflict with Avast. If the configuration hasn't changed, installation of the Clam AV and WSG components is totally optional. There have been a number of updates since then. Nothing wrong with it if you don't mind toolbars, however.) (The toolbar is Crawler's, installed under the marketing guise of "Web Security Guard", a kind of browser add-on a bit like SiteAdvisor. One of those ways was what I perceived to be the developers prioritizing of the toolbar marketing at the expense of the program quality. In some ways superior to Spybot, in many ways probably not superior to Superantispyware. It was pretty good, at the time of its release possibly the only free resident antispy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |